- One 5.15-pound tub of chocolate-flavored whey protein
- Packed with whey protein isolates
- For maintaining and increasing lean muscle mass
- Instantized to mix easily with a spoon
- Each serving provides over 5 grams of BCAAs
Product Description
Optimum Nutrition’s 100% Whey Protein contains 24 grams of protein, only 2-3 grams of carbohydrates, 1.5 grams of fat and minimal lactose, the choice of brand is clear, now to decide what flavor and size! Optimum’s 100% Whey Protein comes in 1, 2 and 5 pound containers and is available in Double Rich Chocolate, Chocolate Mint, Cookies and Cream, Strawberry and Vanilla.
* Picture may be of different size or flavor…
I’m very disappointed about this product. I would never purchase this band again.
Rating: 1 / 5
With the stories
pouring in every
month, we have
developed a new
Splenda mini-site to
add the new stories
each month. For all
stories submitted after
14 April 2005,
please visit the
MINI-SITE.
——————————————————————————–
Before we get started, let us state clearly: If you are experiencing any of the listed symptoms, regardless of your belief that sucralose (Splenda) is the cause, be sure to speak with your physician. The listed symptoms can be caused by allergic reaction, disease, illness, or a condition that requires medical treatment. Be sure to mention your suspicions concerning sucralose, if appropriate.
In response to the studies about the dangers of saccharin and, more recently, aspartame (NutraSweet), along came Splenda. Splenda is the marketing name for sucralose.
Sucralose is a chlorinated sucrose derivative used as an artificial sweetener. It is sold in packets and in bulk for home use under the tradename Splenda, and is used in thousands of products. It’s everywhere and, according to reports from our visitors, so are the problems arising from its use.
Site Map
We have received so
many stories about
Splenda that we
have created a
new page to
link to them.
To read the stories
about Splenda,
just click here.
——————————————————————————–
To read more stories
about Splenda,
just click here.
——————————————————————————–
The problem with sucralose, as it was with aspartame, is that it was rushed through the FDA approval processes without thorough, long-term, independent testing to prove or disprove its potential health hazards. The information is only now being considered by independent organizations and watch groups.
Based upon information supplied to us by our visitors, we note the following possible side effects from consumption of sucralose:
bloating
abdominal pain
gas, sometimes painful
nausea
heartburn
diarrhea
headaches
migraines (severe headaches)
heart palpitations (fluttering, irregular heartbeats)
shortness of breath
depression
anxiety and panic attacks
spaced-out or drugged sensation
joint pain, especially in the knees
dizziness
In addition, the following possible side effects are being reported more often, although not with the same degree of frequency as those listed above:
lone atrial fibrillation
extreme fatigue
muscle weakness
tingling in the mouth or tongue
tingling in the fingers and hands
numbness in the lips and tongue
swollen lips and tongue
swollen face
redness or welts on the face
mouth sores
blurred vision
pain in the eyes
BLOG ALERT: One of our senior editors has created a Splenda-sickness blog where you can read more of the stories submitted to our website, locate your specific suspected symptoms, and add to the blog by including your own story. You can find the new blog by clicking here.
Splenda, the tradename seen in stores on packaging, is a combination of three ingredients: sucralose, dextrose, and maltodextrin. Dextrose is a sweetener. Maltodextrin is a solids builder and drying agent. Neither dextrose nor maltodextrin is known to have any side effects for most people. Anyone with allergies to corn or wheat should speak with their physicians before consuming any product containing dextrose or maltodextrin.
UPDATE: It has been brought to our attention that the information presented on this page may be misleading our visitors. It is with that in mind that we remind our visitors to look beyond FoodandDiet to other sources before beginning or ending their use of sucralose as a sugar substitute. We recommend the following resources for additional information about sucralose:
http://www.holisticmed.com/splenda/
http://proliberty.com/observer/20031112.htm
http://www.laleva.cc/food/splenda.htm
http://www.drmirkin.com/nutrition/N243.html
http://www.vegsource.com/talk/sugarfree/messages/56420.html
It should be noted that little positive information will be found on these websites. If you are interested in reviewing the benefits of Splenda, we recommend a visit to their website at http://www.splenda.com or http://www.sucralose.com.
On 2 April 2004, we received a note from a visitor offering a link to a study and conclusions by a governing body as it concerns sucralose. We read the report and determined that, while the debate concerning mutagenic properties of sucralose may have been resolved at some level, the production of the studies by the manufacturers and licensees leaves us with questions about the credibility of the findings. However, we strongly recommend that everyone read the study and make their own determination. This document is a PDF and will require Adobe’s Acrobat Reader. Click here to read the study.
EDITOR’S NOTE: The study in the PDF document noted above also reveals the chemical composition of sucralose. We are happy to finally see the structure. However, this structure confirms that sucralose is certainly no longer sugar. So, by altering the chemical makeup of the sugar, are we still getting something harmless? An example of minor molecular alteration and its results is H2O (water). It is harmless. Add another oxygen atom and you get H2O2. H2O2 is hydrogen peroxide. That is not harmless. We just thought we’d mention it. (Thanks to J.E. for catching our small typo!)
UPDATE 2: We had previously cited information found in the 23 November 1991 article in the New Scientist. We had removed the information when we could not locate the article to confirm our information. Well, we found it.
Although the article points out that no conclusive studies have been done concerning negative effects of sucralose, the following comment from the close of the article is important to note: “The committee and the CSPI also want more data on the mutagenic properties of 1,6-dichlorofructose, a breakdown product of sucralose. Trace amounts of 1,6-dichlorofructose are sometimes found in canned drinks left to stand for several months. John Howlett, the secretary of the SCF, says: ‘If they (Tate & Lyle) wanted to get the committee to give its endorsement, they should answer those issues.’ ”
According to the Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory in Oxford, England, “mutagenic” is defined thusly: “A mutagenic agent is one which is capable of causing mutations. It may also (but does not necessarily) act as a carcinogen.”
A thorough discussion with your physician is in order if you believe you are suffering ill effects from the use of sucralose or related products.
UPDATE 3: We found the complaint form at the FDA for making reports of side effects from food products. If you have experienced negative reactions or side effects from sucralose, click here to report them. Another report form was suggested by C.E.C.: click here for the downloadable, printable report form from the FDA for adverse reactions.
While some claims link saccharin with cancer, if you must use an artificial sweetener, it may be best to use saccharin. Of course, stevia, rice sirup, and other natural sweeteners are available. However, before you make such a radical change in your diet, you should consider speaking with your physician or a nutritionist.
We believe it is still best to stick with sugar for sweetening. Just remember to count the calories. Try using a bit less each time until you lower your intake in coffees, teas, and other sweetened drinks. You’ll find that you can probably live with half the sugar once you adjust to it. Besides, the sweeter the drink is, the less thirst quenching it is!
If you’ve used Splenda (sucralose) and experienced any of the negative side effects, or if you have a story concerning the positive use of Splenda, please e-mail us your story.
Note that reference to another person’s story appearing on this website cannot be abusive. We reserve the right to edit all incoming stories for content and clarity without significantly changing the original intent. We also reserve the right to refuse to publish any story at our sole discretion.
Rating: 1 / 5
I ordered the 5# tub of Optimum Whey protein powder along with some books. The box they shipped my order in was crushed and the tub cracked in a small crease. I’m not sure if the crushing occurred at Amazon or the shipper but I really think it should have been packed better by Amazon.
Rating: 1 / 5
It seems healthy untill you read on the ingredients list… ARTIFICIAL FLAVOR…. What the hell.!!!! Artificial stuff is the cause of most Illnesses and diseases…. Healthy Foods dont come ARTIFICIALLY.!!!! Try hemp protein that contains RAW ORGANIC HEMP. Protein, Amino acids, Zinc, Magnesium.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GO HEMP GO HEMP… NOT ARTIFICIAL STUFF… ATRIFICIAL KILLS.
Rating: 2 / 5
This product gave me an allergy, I felt like I was going to die or something, I get nightmares just thinking about it. It seems that 0.5% of the population is susceptible to soy allergies and I happen to be one of them. Anyway, this product is not completely whey like the company claims, in fact it has cheap soy added to it. If you will look at the allergen information, it says that soy lecithin is been added to improve mixability. I feel like I have been cheated, if I was living in the United States then I would have sued optimum for sure.
People get your facts straight, whey is imported into United States from Newzealand and Australia. If you check any Newzealand or Australian sites you will know that Whey isolate is very very expensive. It is impossible to sell 10 pounds of this stuff at $60(even if it was a mix of whey concentrate-a cheaper version of whey) If some of you consider suing Optimum, please remember me and send me check as well
Right now I don’t take anything manufactured by so called “bodybuilding product” companies. Remember in 2005 another company Ultimate Nutrition was sued for Super Complete capsules by some Swimmer and had an out of court settlement for half a million dollars.
Rating: 1 / 5